POST #71- Armistice
Note: please try to ignore whatever's happened to the font size; I'm working on it.
In my last post, I only skittered over some of the issues that surround a particular aspect of photography nowadays; that issue was the photography of children. This time I'm going to go over something particularly close to my heart at the minute, as I near the end of my first year studying photojournalism with some new thoughts on the matter. You see, when I'm not boring the living daylights out of my family, friends, boyfriend, lecturers, flatmates and Falmouth's stray cats and bus drivers with my latest reflections on documentary photography, I'm sulking into a mug of tea with the same questions on my mind.
In this series of photographs, I visited The Poppy Factory in Richmond, which is near to where I hail from originally and conveniently near to where my dad works (I love it when the transport works out, as it rarely does in Cornwall). Established in 1922, the Factory has been helping injured, sick and disabled ex-servicemen and women and their dependents by giving them employment that may be hard to find elsewhere.
It's inevitable that a photographer attends a shoot with certain expectations, and hearing 'Moves Like Jagger' over the sound system on my arrival wasn't one of them. Not that I was necessarily expecting Vera Lynn's 'White Cliffs of Dover', or even 'Run Rabbit Run', but there was something jarring about the passive, businesslike way that the employees assembled the wreaths and posies with which we remember the dead.
Many of my ethical qualms with photography have been that the focus in ‘issues-based’ photography is so monotonous- we claim to shoot from the perspective of ‘raising awareness’ of our subjects but often the genuine empathy is conspicuous only in its absence. And yet I suspect that this is not deliberate; we simply don't know how to emphathise any more. Each day we're confronted with a different variety of misfortunes via the newspapers, morning TV shows, internet sites- dare I say it, Twitter- and it has become more and more usual to receive these bulletins accompanied with a photograph. The news is no longer a man or woman sat at a desk reading- we don't listen with our ears any more, we listen with our eyes. It's easier to look at a photograph and rely on our initial response than fully embrace the gravity of what's happening, or indeed to grasp our own relativity to the situation. I blame the rise in 'slacktivism' on this- slacktivism is the idea that by sharing a photograph or piece of text through social networks we are somehow feeding starving children in Africa, or stopping deforestation. From the comfortable platform of Western civilisation we can only despair at the sight of a child thinner than we could ever have imagined, but simultaneously we are so used to the adverts and poster appeals that we are no longer hit by the true meaning, and have become anaesthetised to seeing horrors. But it's not necessarily our fault; in evolutionary terms our minds are best suited to deal with small social groups, with problems that we have a greater degree of control over. If we are sad or angry, it is likely that the issue is within our grasp, not halfway across the world. Susan Sontag's essay Regarding the Pain of Others has some interesting points on this matter and I'd thoroughly recommend a read.
I digress (as per usual). At the Factory, I met a variety of characters from various backgrounds, most of whom were living with some kind of disability- auditory, visual, mobility, etc.- and settled comfortably into my habit of forgetting that I am in fact a photographer and chatting to the employees for countless hours. At some point I remembered I had a camera round my neck, and by this time many of the employees were used to my bumbling presence.
There's something about taking a portrait that comes alive when you have a connection with the subject. Certainly an hour long natter about the Isle of Wight would no doubt be considered a huge waste of expensive time in the industry, but when you're dealing with a subject who has been through any kind of ordeal, it's just too easy to take a black and white portrait and call it 'poignant', and claim that we understand the difficulties faced by an amputee, a terminally ill patient, an immigrant alone in a country that resents them. We may flatter ourselves that we can grasp the misfortunes that have befallen them, but at heart
This is why I have chosen to show these two photographs instead of one of the numerous portraits of the Factory's employees.
KW

































